Democratic Party of Korea decides to revise party platform to include Universal Basic Income

The Latest On
Basic Income Today

The most tragic effects are those experienced by children, who are significantly more likely than other children to show developmental delays, disruptions in their schooling, family separation and emotional difficulties. Homelessness affects the whole community. The growing number of encampments, or “tent cities,” entail significant costs to local sanitation, health and fire departments. It doesn’t have to be this way. There are effective ways of dealing with the problem. One way is to build more affordable housing, but this takes years. Another is through programs like Housing First, which provides rent subsidies. There is another solution, though, that has been shown to be effective and immediate in reducing homelessness, through the provision of a basic annual income. Basic income programs provide individuals with an unconditional annual cash transfer from the government to allow them to meet their basic needs, whatever those needs might be. One such program is the New Leaf Project in Vancouver. The program distributed $7,500 to each of 50 individuals who had been homeless for up to two years and then tracked them over the next year to see the impact these payments had on their housing situation. The results? Program participants spent 99 fewer days unhoused than they had before receiving the payment and spent significantly less time in shelters. In fact, it was estimated that there was a savings of $8,277 in shelter costs for each individual receiving the $7,500 payment. In other words, the program resulted in a cost savings of more than $750 for each person enrolled in the program. It is often thought that people who receive free money will just spend it on things like drugs and alcohol. This did not happen with the New Leaf participants. Rather, they spent their money on necessities like rent, food and transportation. Other programs have found similar effects. The Denver Basic Income Project provided cash payments to 800 people in Denver. Some recipients received monthly payments of $1,000; others received a lump sum of $6,500 up front, and then $500 per month; and a third group received only $50 per month. After six months, the percentage of participants in all three groups who were living in their own apartment or house went up substantially. Those receiving the lump sum payment and monthly allowance showed the greatest impact. Thirty-five per cent of them went from being unhoused to living in their own house or apartment. Can we afford to have such programs in our communities? The question should really be: can we afford not to?

Housing those in need through a basic income

December 6, 2024

New findings from Sam Altman’s basic income study challenge one of the main arguments against the idea

December 5, 2024

Tacoma guaranteed basic income pilot results released

December 4, 2024

University of Chicago study praises rollout of city’s guaranteed basic income pilot

December 3, 2024

Study Universal Basic Income at the University of Sydney

December 2, 2024

UK to kind of, but not really, test basic income for unhoused people

November 29, 2024

December 11, 2024

By The Korea Times

See original post here.

The main opposition Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) decided Monday to revise its platform to include former leader Lee Jae-myung’s “basic society” welfare plan centering on guaranteeing universal basic income.

The new party platform will better reflect Lee’s long-sought vision for a “basic society” with state-funded basic income, basic housing and other living standards, which he believes will help improve people’s livelihoods.

During a meeting of the party’s central committee, the DPK also decided to add a preamble on restoring the 2018 inter-Korean military agreement and come up with measures to prevent accidental military clashes with North Korea.

The move comes after Seoul fully suspended the 2018 inter-Korean military tension reduction agreement in June in response to North Korea’s sending of trash-carrying balloons.

The DPK also decided to revise the party’s charter to expand penalties for those who refuse to accept the party’s election nominations. Currently, those who refuse to accept the results of primaries are banned from running for public office on the party’s ticket for 10 years, and the penalty will be expanded to those refusing to accept the party’s nomination results.

The revisions will be confirmed at the party’s national convention on Sunday, during which Lee is likely to win a second term as party chief. (Yonhap)